Seriously?

So I have been at home the whole day, watching TV, and in every local channel I tune in to, the hot topic of discussion is the "sex video" of Katrina Halili and Hayden Kho (or is it Koh?).

I got curious, naturally, so I searched youtube for the controversial video, watched it, and got confused as to why that particular video I've seen merits this much hype from the media. I mean, what I saw were a very sexy Katrina Halili in her underwear dancing to the tune of Careless Whisper, and a very sweaty Hayden Kho, clad in his briefs, gyrating to and singing the same song. Hmmm. I finished the whole clip and nowhere therein did I see anyone taking off their remaining apparel and performing sexual intercourse.

Okay, I thought, maybe I watched the snipped version of the video. Hence, I watched another, and another, and then another. I pretty much saw the same thing: two very hot persons gyrating to the tune of a very sexy song.

So what the heck is all the fuss about?

I can't see how the video I've seen is any different from the dance numbers I have seen countless of times in local variety shows where the dancers (usually, the female dancers) are only clad in very skimpy clothings shaking whatever assets they have been generously given. It made me ask, since when did the definition of "sex video" exclude the actuality that there must first be sex in the video? Hmmm.

I do hope that there is more to the "sex video" than what I've actually seen because if not, that video is, and remains to be, a simple footage of two persons dancing. Period.

And Katrina Halili is not any less of a sexy actress because of that.

Hello!